Breaking: Trump Administration Threatens to Cut Funding for Pennsylvania’s Hydrogen Hubs, Sparking Jobs vs. Energy Debate
In a move that’s stirring up controversy, the Trump administration is reportedly considering pulling the plug on federal funding for two major hydrogen hubs in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. But here’s where it gets controversial: these projects, part of a broader push toward cleaner energy, could lose a staggering $1.7 billion in federal support, leaving thousands of jobs hanging in the balance. This story, brought to you by the WHYY News Climate Desk, dives into the heart of the debate over energy, jobs, and the future of our region.
The Philadelphia-based Mid-Atlantic Clean Hydrogen Hub (MACH2) and the Pittsburgh-based Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub (ARCH2) are on the chopping block, according to documents obtained by several news outlets. These hubs, designed to accelerate the production of clean hydrogen, were hailed as key players in the Biden administration’s ambitious goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. And this is the part most people miss: while MACH2 focuses on using renewable energy to produce hydrogen, ARCH2 plans to use fracked natural gas, capturing and storing carbon underground—a method that’s not without its critics.
Both hubs survived an initial round of cuts last week, which spared over $43 million for clean energy projects in Delaware and New Jersey. However, the latest list targets 300 additional projects nationwide, including these Pennsylvania hubs. The Department of Energy (DOE) has yet to finalize these decisions, but the writing on the wall is clear: the Trump administration is taking aim at what it calls “Green New Scam funding to fuel the Left’s climate agenda.”
Bold move or misguided policy? Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a staunch supporter of the hubs, argues that cutting funding would jeopardize tens of thousands of jobs across the state. He points out the irony: just months ago, President Trump himself praised Pennsylvania’s energy initiatives during a visit to Pittsburgh. “If these rumors are true, continuing to support Pennsylvania’s two hydrogen hubs is critical to proving that he meant what he said,” Shapiro’s spokesperson, Rosie Lapowsky, told WHYY News.
The stakes are high. MACH2, a public-private partnership, secured $18.8 million in initial funding from the DOE in January 2021, with a federal cost share of up to $750 million. The hub promised to create 20,000 jobs across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. ARCH2, meanwhile, was set to receive $925 million in federal funding, with plans to develop 11 projects across West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
But here’s the question that’s dividing experts: Is hydrogen the clean energy solution we’ve been waiting for, or is it a costly detour? Critics argue that relying on natural gas, even with carbon capture, isn’t truly “clean.” Proponents counter that it’s a practical step toward reducing emissions while supporting jobs in energy-dependent regions.
As the debate heats up, one thing is certain: the fate of these hubs will shape Pennsylvania’s energy future—and its economy. What do you think? Is cutting funding for these projects a necessary correction, or a missed opportunity for cleaner energy and job growth? Let us know in the comments below.
WHYY thanks our sponsors—become a WHYY sponsor today and support fact-based, in-depth journalism. Your contribution helps us bring you stories that matter. (https://whyy.org/support-our-journalism)
